The purchase price gap between a new and a genuinely refurbished AccurioPress is often large enough to make the decision feel obvious. But purchase price is only the starting point of a 3-year cost picture — depreciation, warranty coverage, service costs, and resale value all shift the real comparison, sometimes in the refurbished machine’s favor and sometimes not. Here’s how to think through it properly instead of deciding on sticker price alone.
Year one: where the numbers actually start
New machine:
- Highest purchase price, but full manufacturer warranty coverage typically included
- Steepest depreciation happens in this first year, as with most capital equipment
- Lower probability of unexpected part replacement, since all major components are new
Refurbished machine:
- Significantly lower purchase price
- Depreciation curve is much flatter, since the steepest depreciation already happened under the previous owner
- If genuinely refurbished (see our guide on what a real refurbishment includes), wear-part risk in year one should be low — but this depends entirely on refurbishment quality
The gap in year one is almost always in the refurbished machine’s favor on raw cost, assuming the refurbishment was done properly.
Year two: where the comparison starts shifting
New machine:
- Still likely under original warranty, depending on term length
- First wear-part replacements may begin depending on volume
Refurbished machine:
- Extended refurbishment warranty (if offered) may be ending or already ended
- First wear-part replacement cycle more likely to fall in this window, depending on how much life was remaining on original components at purchase
This is typically where an AMC decision (covered in our AMC vs pay-per-service guide) becomes more relevant for a refurbished machine specifically — locking in predictable costs right as warranty coverage tapers off.
Year three: total cost picture becomes clearer
By year three, the comparison usually comes down to:
- Total service and part costs incurred — this is where refurbishment quality from year one really shows its value or its cost
- Any major component replacements needed — drum, developer, fuser, or belt reaching end of life on either machine
- Resale or trade-in value, if you’re planning to upgrade again — new machines typically retain a higher percentage resale value than an already-refurbished unit, though the gap in absolute terms is smaller than the original purchase price gap
What tips the comparison toward “new”
- Very high, consistent daily volume where warranty coverage and minimal early service risk matter most
- A business where downtime cost is high enough that even a small risk of early refurbished-unit issues isn’t worth it
- Plans to keep and resell the machine at a higher resale value later
What tips the comparison toward “refurbished”
- Starting or growing a shop where capital outlay matters more than marginal risk (our guide on starting a printing business covers this in more depth)
- Moderate, predictable volume where a genuine refurbishment’s remaining component life comfortably covers your expected ownership period
- Willingness to pair the machine with an AMC plan to manage cost predictability from year one, effectively narrowing the reliability gap with a new machine
The honest bottom line
A genuinely refurbished machine, from a seller who actually replaces worn components and backs the machine with a real warranty, very often produces a better 3-year total cost outcome than a new machine — precisely because the steepest depreciation and highest purchase price are avoided, while service risk is managed through proper refurbishment and an AMC plan. The comparison only breaks down when the refurbishment itself was cosmetic rather than genuine, which is why refurbishment quality matters more to this calculation than the refurbished-vs-new decision itself.
Want a realistic cost comparison for your specific volume and budget?
Tell us your expected monthly volume and budget range — we can walk you through a realistic new vs. refurbished comparison specific to your situation, not a generic rule of thumb.
Year one: where the numbers actually start
New machine:
- Highest purchase price, but full manufacturer warranty coverage typically included
- Steepest depreciation happens in this first year, as with most capital equipment
- Lower probability of unexpected part replacement, since all major components are new
Refurbished machine:
- Significantly lower purchase price
- Depreciation curve is much flatter, since the steepest depreciation already happened under the previous owner
- If genuinely refurbished (see our guide on what a real refurbishment includes), wear-part risk in year one should be low — but this depends entirely on refurbishment quality
The gap in year one is almost always in the refurbished machine’s favor on raw cost, assuming the refurbishment was done properly.
Year two: where the comparison starts shifting
New machine:
- Still likely under original warranty, depending on term length
- First wear-part replacements may begin depending on volume
Refurbished machine:
- Extended refurbishment warranty (if offered) may be ending or already ended
- First wear-part replacement cycle more likely to fall in this window, depending on how much life was remaining on original components at purchase
This is typically where an AMC decision (covered in our AMC vs pay-per-service guide) becomes more relevant for a refurbished machine specifically — locking in predictable costs right as warranty coverage tapers off.
Year three: total cost picture becomes clearer
By year three, the comparison usually comes down to:
- Total service and part costs incurred — this is where refurbishment quality from year one really shows its value or its cost
- Any major component replacements needed — drum, developer, fuser, or belt reaching end of life on either machine
- Resale or trade-in value, if you’re planning to upgrade again — new machines typically retain a higher percentage resale value than an already-refurbished unit, though the gap in absolute terms is smaller than the original purchase price gap
What tips the comparison toward “new”
- Very high, consistent daily volume where warranty coverage and minimal early service risk matter most
- A business where downtime cost is high enough that even a small risk of early refurbished-unit issues isn’t worth it
- Plans to keep and resell the machine at a higher resale value later
What tips the comparison toward “refurbished”
- Starting or growing a shop where capital outlay matters more than marginal risk (our guide on starting a printing business covers this in more depth)
- Moderate, predictable volume where a genuine refurbishment’s remaining component life comfortably covers your expected ownership period
- Willingness to pair the machine with an AMC plan to manage cost predictability from year one, effectively narrowing the reliability gap with a new machine
The honest bottom line
A genuinely refurbished machine, from a seller who actually replaces worn components and backs the machine with a real warranty, very often produces a better 3-year total cost outcome than a new machine — precisely because the steepest depreciation and highest purchase price are avoided, while service risk is managed through proper refurbishment and an AMC plan. The comparison only breaks down when the refurbishment itself was cosmetic rather than genuine, which is why refurbishment quality matters more to this calculation than the refurbished-vs-new decision itself.
Want a realistic cost comparison for your specific volume and budget?
Tell us your expected monthly volume and budget range — we can walk you through a realistic new vs. refurbished comparison specific to your situation, not a generic rule of thumb.
Facing this on your machine?
Send your model and the issue - our Konica Minolta experts will help you sort it out.